jump to navigation

Telangana movement- where is it heading? డిసెంబర్ 4, 2009

Posted by Telangana Utsav in 1969, Articles, bandh, Congress, Culture, Economy, elections, Fazal Ali Commission, Identity, livelihoods, Mulki, Osmania, politics, TDP, Telangana, TRS.
trackback

Telangana in limelight

G S Vasu
First Published : 04 Dec 2009 11:56:00 PM IST
Last Updated : 04 Dec 2009 12:50:36 AM IST

AS I watched over television on Sunday almost a dozen policemen beating up a lone student who fell to the ground on the Osmania University campus in Hyderabad, I was reminded of a short story written by former Prime Minister the late P V Narasimha Rao. Titled Golla Ramavva and written in the 1940s, it was about how an old woman sheltered a young Congress functionary in her thatched hut in Warangal district of the Telangana region when the Nizam’s policemen came looking for him. However, the students of OU, who were taking out a peaceful march seeking a separate Telangana state, had no such Guardian Angel.

Nine years after K Chandrasekhara Rao formed the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) with the objective of achieving a separate state of Telangana, the movement appears to have taken a decisive directional change, away from politicos to encompass a whole lot of other sections, mainly students and teachers. Over the past few days, three students committed suicide while a constable shot himself dead, hoping their deaths would end the perceived discrimination against the people of Telangana.

There are two ways in which one could look at the demand — either through the prism of TRS and what Rao and his men have done or not done since 2001 or independent of this. Let us look at both.

While none can take away the credit of bringing the issue to the limelight not only in the state but also at the national level from Rao, his fundamental mistake lay in complete reliance on political management to achieve the goal.

Within three years after forming the TRS, he was on Cloud Nine, sharing power with the Congress both in the state and at the Centre, having forged an alliance with it in the 2004 elections. Intoxicated by power, it took him two years to realise his folly and break out of the alliance as he came under pressure for ignoring the purpose for which he formed the TRS.

One fine morning in 2008, on the auspicious occasion of Dasara, Chandrababu Naidu of Telugu Desam Party, till then a strong votary of a united Andhra, declared support for a Telangana State. As a natural consequence, the TDP and the TRS came together during the 2009 polls which was rightly seen as opportunistic by the people. As the alliance bombed, both parted ways as quickly as they came together but with more rancour, and the TDP has since been silent on the demand.

As social scientist N Venugopal pointed out in the only English book brought out recently on Telangana, the TRS has never attempted to build a mass movement on issues concerning the region, whether it be projects taken up to benefit other regions by diverting water which should have been earmarked for Telangana or repatriation of non-local government employees in accordance with a formula laid down several years ago.

As someone who believes in himself, Rao has also utterly failed in building the party through village, mandal and district committees. Like most politicians, he too preferred his kin to sincere workers while allotting party tickets.

One might, therefore, wonder how the TRS has survived for nine years despite all the negative steps taken by Rao and why people moved in such large numbers when he wanted to launch a fast-unto-death a few days ago. The answer lies in what several political leaders, including Congress chief Sonia Gandhi have said time and again: “We are conscious of people’s craving for a separate state.” For one to understand this craving, one has to look at it through the other prism — independent of TRS — and from a historical, social and economic perspective which could be repetitive for those in the know of things but all the same important to be mentioned here.

Most parts of Telangana were under the control of the Nizam as part of the Hyderabad state even after India achieved independence, and people faced the tyranny of Razakars for years. Then followed the integration of Hyderabad into the Indian Union and the constitution of the States’ Reorganisation Commission under the chairmanship of Justice Syed Fazl Ali. People of Telangana never wanted to be a part of Andhra State, and this is precisely what was recommended by Fazl Ali: that Telugu-speaking districts of the erstwhile Nizam dominion be carved out to form a Hyderabad state independent of the rest of the Andhra state.

That did not happen and a unified Telugu state came into being with what was called a gentlemen’s agreement to protect the interests of Telangana. Every bit of it relating to financial resources, water, jobs etc., was violated leading to a violent agitation for a separate state in the late ’60s in which more than 350 students and youth died. The party which had spearheaded the movement then won handsomely in parliamentary elections but ultimately merged with the Congress and the leaders who championed the cause went on to hold high positions including chief ministership.

Over the years, successive governments, including those headed by leaders from the region, did little to assuage the sense of alienation or deprivation among the people. Inappropriate it might be but I should mention here a brief conversation I had with the late chief minister Y S Rajasekhara Reddy during the April-May elections this year. He made it clear then that as long as he was at the helm, there was no question of yielding to the demand for a separate Telangana state. In fact, he did everything possible to weaken the TRS and the lapses of Rao only made YSR’s task easier. The TRS was split by “weaning” away quite a few legislators, and its candidates were bought over.

But that was like applying balm to a disease that requires a surgery. Two months after YSR’s death, the issue has come to haunt the powers-that-be once again. Critics of Chandrasekhara Rao described his indefinite fast as yet another “drama” enacted in connivance with the establishment to shore up his plummeting image. Whether Rao himself wanted it or not, his fast has attracted wider sections of people, till now inactive, to the movement. They have declared that they would carry it forward, irrespective of Chandrasekhara Rao.

The least the government should do is open a dialogue with the interested groups, something that the Pranab Mukherjee committee set up way back in 2004, promised but never did. The last and the right course always exists: hold a referendum and seal the issue once and for all. If and when a Telangana state is formed, the people won’t forget the contribution of police officers who ordered caning on the students. Because, it is that image of the student being brutally caned which has spurred the current movement, something KCR has not managed to achieve in nine years.

vasu@expressbuzz.com
About the author: G S Vasu is Resident Editor, The New Indian Express (Andhra Pradesh) and is based in Hyderabad

source: new indian express December 4, 2009
http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/story.aspx?Title=Telangana+in+limelight&artid=pumt6jsLgVc=&SectionID=XVSZ2Fy6Gzo=&MainSectionID=XVSZ2Fy6Gzo=&SectionName=m3GntEw72ik=

వ్యాఖ్యలు»

1. Srinivas Bodduluri - డిసెంబర్ 4, 2009

the article was a good-read, largely objcetive. referendum, however, would have been a solution when telangana was habitated only by those born there. hyderabad and some interior areas too have large populations from other districts of andhra and rayalseema. given the jingoism of trs and the sway of the masses over emotive issues, from tomorrow they are bound to be targeted over every problem

2. Rao - డిసెంబర్ 14, 2009

I’m no authority in the matter of neither Telengana nor the historical sequence of events that took place to form Visalandhra. I did some research, on internet, and read that the formation of Visalandhra is due to the fact that Majority of the elected representatives from Andhra Legislative Assembly and Hyderabad Legislative Assembly supported Visalandhra. Consequent to this, by the influence of Congress high command (I’m amazed at how the High command factor defeats the internal democracy), leaders in Andhra and Hyderabad Legislative Assemblies have come to a ‘Gentlemans Understanding’ to constitute Reginal Council for allround development of Telengana. Later on this agency, like any other Governmental agency, failed to safeguard the interests of its constituents. An agitation in 1969 has lead to re-implementation of rule called ‘Mulki’ which was followed by Nizam earlier. This allows all the jobs of the Government to be filled only by the people born in old Hyderabad State or who has been resident in Hyderabad State for 15 years. (This is similar to the work visa and Green Card restrictions in USA – Looks ridiculous to me how within a country, people are restricted to work). This has been challenged in High Court, defeated and Supreme Court overruled the High Courts ruling and at the end Mulki implementation stood valid. An agitation in Andhra districts forced the administration to abolish Mulki Rule and a new ‘Six point’ formula came to existence.

Two objects of forming Telengana State – 1. To generate employment 2. To build irrigation resources to cultivate lands all over Telengana. Looking back what we have seen post independence, I’m really critical if any one of these objectives will be fulfilled

3. k.n Mohan - డిసెంబర్ 17, 2009

At a personal level I am saddned by the development. Successive governments have ignored the issue or used it for sectional interests. The TRS is basically an group of landed interests and neo-rich lumpens as are Rajagopal and Mohan Babu in the Congress and the PRP is dominated by the ame sections. In Rrayalaseema the Jagan group is factionists transformed into the lumpen neo rich.

What is worse is the actions of the left intellectual and parties – they ar backing KCR and his group instead of trying build an independent movement.
The issue has come to the front – the way to resolve it is by a referundum in the districts. The only tragedy is that lumpen rich will come to power and the left will be left with egg on their face. The Congress may not wish to hold a referundum because of the precedent it will set for the North East and Kashmir. If the left has any spine left it should agitate for a referundum instead of playing second fiddle to TRS and the lumpen rich.


స్పందించండి

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / మార్చు )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / మార్చు )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / మార్చు )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / మార్చు )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: